LEV Testing: Requirements, Regulations and the 14-Month Rule

Workplace Exposure

LEV Testing: Requirements, Regulations and the 14-Month Rule

Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) captures airborne contaminants — dust, fume, mist, vapour, gas — at the point of generation. Under COSHH Regulation 9, employers must have LEV systems formally examined and tested at least every 14 months. This is the rule, the method, and what HSE inspectors look for.

Acronym

Local Exhaust Ventilation

Legal basis

COSHH 2002, Reg 9

Test interval

≤14 months

Competence

BOHS P601

01

What LEV is, and what it isn't

LEV is engineering control: a captor hood, ductwork, air mover (fan) and discharge (often with filtration) that removes contaminant at source, before it enters the worker's breathing zone. Examples: welding fume extraction, soldering snorkels, woodworking dust extract, paint-booth backdraught, lab fume cupboards, kitchen canopy hoods (which sit at the intersection of LEV and TR19).

General room ventilation, recirculating air cleaners, and PPE (RPE) are not LEV. Under COSHH's hierarchy of control, LEV outranks RPE — RPE is the last line, not the substitute.

03

What a TExT actually involves

A competent LEV examiner performs three linked steps:

  1. Thorough visual examination — physical condition of hoods, ductwork, dampers, fans, filters, discharge points
  2. Measurement — hood face/capture velocities, duct transport velocities, static pressures, filter pressure drop, motor current
  3. Comparison against commissioning data — the system's original performance baseline (or HSG258 benchmark in its absence)

Results are documented in a TExT report with a clear pass/fail verdict per hood, plus remedial actions and a recommended re-test interval.

04

Who can examine LEV — competence requirements

HSG258 (HSE's Controlling airborne contaminants at work) defines competence. In practice, the recognised UK qualification is BOHS P601 — Initial Appraisal and Thorough Examination and Testing of LEV Systems. Examiners should be independent of installation and maintenance contractors where possible to avoid conflict of interest.

05

What inspectors find

  • Hoods positioned too far from the source (capture velocity collapses with distance squared)
  • Flexible duct kinks and crushed sections reducing transport velocity below settling thresholds
  • Filters never changed — pressure drop unmonitored
  • Systems modified (extra branches added) without rebalancing
  • No commissioning data, so no baseline to test against
  • RPE used to compensate for poorly-performing LEV — a Reg 9 failure

Next step

Need a TExT or LEV competence review?

Book an LEV assessment